...I like the idea of a public moderation field. It could turn out badly, but it could also turn out well. Amending one's modding would be nice, too.

As to the number of mods, I think the current setup is all right. Everyone who's a regular can contribute to the process. There is a higher authority though, when it's needed. I'd like to see the "higher authorities" crack down a little harder on violations of the rules, but it's not my forum. Really, there's only two rules that seem to be broken often around here (flames and grudges), so it shouldn't be too hard to enforce them, if the folks in charge wish to do so.

• On moderation. . . - Mr. Spork,  06-09-2005 00:08 (Views: 1592; Replies: 9)
• Definitely some good ideas... - Jed,  06-09-2005 01:41 (Views: 1559)
• Thanks. . . - Mr. Spork,  06-09-2005 05:20 (Views: 1677)
• Ooh....i see potential for an ebay-style rating system... - pudds,  06-09-2005 07:54 (Views: 1607)
• Mod remarks can be put into a user's profile as well. . . - Mr. Spork,  06-10-2005 04:08 (Views: 1534)
• Do we have enough people to justify that? - Ciaervo,  06-10-2005 05:10 (Views: 1538)
• one nice feature would be: consistency. no programming needed. - wacky,  06-10-2005 05:12 (Views: 1570)
• Oh stop whining! :) [nt] - Sycrapht,  06-09-2005 01:43 (Views: 1499)
• ok zim [nt] - russ,  06-09-2005 01:54 (Views: 1860)
• Well it was obvious it was me Russ. I wasn't "hiding" :) - Zimphire,  06-09-2005 03:05 (Views: 1584)

 

You do not have the required security level to post to this thread.

Report a Bug!

Exec Time(ms): <15