Main Forum Index

Forum Home

Post Reply

Email Forum Admins

Log In

Search Forums

Read Messages

Send a Message

Edit Your Settings

Forum Rules


By:  Sycraft (Administrators; 20728)
Posted on: 09-22-2004 18:16.
Client: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10
IP: Logged 
Message views: 755 (Score: 0 Protected)  

It's still an invalid argument. Putnam was trying to argue meaning isn't all in the head, doesn't make his argument any more valid. His frame of reference isn't a possible one. Beyond that, I can destory most of the specifics, but you'd just ignroe it anyhow.

Instead here's an article that argues differently, only using a standard factual presentation. Is it true and accurate? Well you evaluate that for yourself. Of course seeing as it doesn't agree with your views, I already know which way that'll go.