Well, not to impugn your knowledge of the Fourth, but Illinois v. Gates........
novanglus (Registered; 12675)
Posted on: 04-27-2011 16:50.
Client: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27
Message views: 1204 (Score: 0)
...and the rules regarding the reliability of informants disagrees with you. You might also read the Aguilar-Spinelli cases to get an idea of why informant reliability it sorta important in protecting your Constitutional rights.
-----To translate it into UNIX system administration terms (Randy’s fundamental metaphor for just about everything), the post-modern politically correct atheists were like people who had found themselves in charge of a big and unfathomably complex computer system (viz. society) with no documentation or instructions of any kind, and so whose only way to keep the thing running was to invent and enforce certain rules with a kind of neo-Puritanical rigor, because they were at a loss to deal with any kind of deviations from what they saw as the norm. Whereas people who were wired into a church were like UNIX system administrators who, while they might not understand everything, at least had some documentation, some FAQs and How-tos and README files, providing some guidance on what to do when things got out of whack. -Neil Stephenson, Cyrptonomicon
- Post hidden due to moderation - Elyk, 04-27-2011 15:23 (Views: 24; Replies: 14)
You do not have the required security level to post to this thread.
Report a Bug!